Choices- a quote from pirkeavos.com
"God
created a world in which some actions tend to make His presence clearer
and more real, while some actions tend to obscure His presence and make
Him seem more distant. Man was created with the ability and opportunity
to choose between these behaviors. While not all choices have a moral
component (e.g. picking between vanilla vs. chocolate), those that do
bring you closer to God.
These
“physical actions with a moral and spiritual aspect” are called
“mitzvot” and act as a link between the spiritual and the physical.
Mitzvot serve as the levers which allow physical actions to perfect a
supra-physical soul. Each choice of good tends to refine the world, and
brings the benefit of a closer relationship with God. Each rejection of
good tends to corrupt the world and brings the detriment of distance
from God.
TWO SIDES OF CHOICE
Paradoxically,
this model — where good choices bring clear rewards and bad choices
bring obvious damage — actually fails to bring the maximum good into the
world. It is clear that God’s ultimate goal for human beings is not for
them to do good. It is for human beings to choose to do good. If God
merely wanted to maximize the number of “good” actions in the world, he
could have created a race of puppets and robots who would invariably
exhibit the desired behaviors. For behaviors and choices to be
meaningful, it is critical that we could have acted otherwise… but chose
to do good.
If all destructive choices were immediately answered with an electric shock, only crazies would do evil. | |
If
God had created a world in which all good actions were rewarded with
chocolate, and all destructive choices were immediately answered with an
electric shock, only crazies and rebels would dare to do evil. Although
we would theoretically have “choice,” we would be functional
automatons.
This
idea suggests one answer to the puzzle of why God “hardened Pharaoh’s
heart” during the Ten Plagues. On the surface, it would seem that God
was removing Pharaoh’s free will. If you look deeper, you will
understand that God was actually restoring it. In the face of the
overwhelmingly tragic consequences of holding back the Jews, how could
any sane man resist the demands of God? The battle was so dominated by
God that Pharaoh was compelled by logic to concede.
Confronted
by such mind-boggling firepower, Pharaoh was a mere puppet without any
real choice. By hardening his heart, God gave Pharaoh the strength to
counteract the force of the open miracles, and returned to Pharaoh the
ability to decide according to his desires, independent of the external
consequences.
In
a world in which good choices clearly produce rewards, and bad choices
bring damages, there would be no moral choices — just economic ones.
Doing good would be reduced to a financially optimal decision rather
than a spiritually purifying one. Thus it was necessary to create a
world where there was a “cost” to doing good and a “benefit” to doing
evil. Spending money to feed the poor reduces your ability to indulge
your pleasures, while bonking someone on the head does in fact get you a
new wallet, some credit cards and a little extra spending cash. The
question is, are they worth your soul?
You
were created with two competing motivators: Will and Desire. The
ultimate battleground of Free Will is the struggle between what you know you should do and what you feel like doing. Youfeel like taking his wallet, but you know you shouldn’t. You knowyou should help someone out of a bind, but it’s more trouble than you feel like.
Human
Beings were given a powerful drive to satisfy short-term physical
desires, and also the strength of will to act instead according to their
understanding of what’s proper. The Torah — our “Instructions for
Living” — helps clarify that understanding"
No comments:
Post a Comment